EXCLUSIVE: Family Court Judges Sending Children Into Danger, Independent Investigations Show

The U.S. Court system has shed light on a disturbing pattern in the past three months, where at least a dozen children have been deliberately put in the custody of parents who appear to be dangerous, resulting in their tragic deaths.

According to the Center for Judicial Excellence, a national organization that closely monitors the pattern, over 900 children have lost their lives at the hands of one of their parents in the United States since 2008.

A study of the murders shows that many children were killed by a parent who was granted either shared or sole custody by a judge, despite there being strong evidence of child abuse or a conviction against them.

Out of the 53 children who have been killed since 2022 following a custody change to the fathers, it is evident that fathers are predominantly responsible for the majority of these murders, with seven being committed by mothers.

Epoch Times Photo
Three-year-old Sophia Berry was allegedly killed by her father, Dan Hollins, in January after a Colorado family court judge refused to consider evidence of child abuse. (Courtesy of Sophia Berry’s Family)

In Colorado, four children lost their lives in January and February due to murder-suicides committed by their fathers.

Court records reveal that in all four cases, judges ignored the safety concerns expressed by the mothers of the children, as reported by the Denver Gazette and confirmed by The Epoch Times, if custody was granted to the fathers, without providing any explanation.

Andrea Berry is one of those mothers. Allegedly, her ex-husband, Dan Hollins, killed their 3-year-old daughter, Sophia, and then committed suicide in February.

The Colorado Gazette reported that Elizabeth Berry, a police commander, informed her department to cease pestering Sophia, as she had been using child pornography and sexually abusing her. Berry stated that she had spent seven months attempting to get the police to investigate the allegations against him.

Judge Rebecca Moss, who insinuated that Berry would forfeit custody if she mentioned any abuse claims, received a more unfavorable reply from Douglas County Family Court when she raised such allegations.

According to court documents, Berry reported that Sophia came home with ligature marks around her ankles after encounters with him in which she told stories about sexual experiences with Hollins.

Family Judges Not Following Law

The Campaign Abuse Stop director of national research, Barry Goldstein, who is a former attorney, told The Epoch Times that one major cause of the disturbing trend of child abuse is the assumption by family court judges that the role of a therapist is more like that of a charged individual with the application of law, rather than a problem-solving role for family issues.

Goldstein stated, “The goal is to convict the person and bring criminal charges against the offender if they are a stranger.”

“The objective is to bring the offender and the victim back together, and the inquiry is conducted by a social worker in cases where the offender is an individual the child is acquainted with, particularly a close family member.”

“That implies the mother is instructing the child,” stated Goldstein, manipulating the truth in the most extreme way, “and the child is hiding all the evidence of silence and abuse,” Goldstein continued to manipulate the truth in the most extreme way, “and the mother’s coaching of the child means there is no evidence of abuse to be found, so the only option is for the child to remain silent and conceal any evidence of abuse,” Goldstein concluded.

Two studies pointed out the trend of adverse childhood experiences on abusive parents to children, which was investigated by Daniel Saunders, a professor at the National Institute of Justice and the Division of Violence Prevention at the CDC’s Justice and Prevention Violence Institute.

He studies both said that custody decisions in cases involving protective mothers and abusive fathers often favor the safety and well-being of the children, as the overwhelming evidence provided by the family court judges does not prioritize endangering them.

He stated that judges adhere to a non-scientific concept referred to as “parental

Parental Alienation

As a result of the emotional coercion by the other party, parental alienation signifies a child’s distancing from one parent, sparking a significant controversy surrounding the terminology.

Various contemporary organizations, like Project Media Justice, advocate for the concept; using well-established methods to conceal their abusive actions, as claimed by certain individuals.

Maybe you are interested  2023 » How Many Days until Hanukkah? Untildays.com

Both sides should agree that allegations of abuse should never be dismissed merely as manipulation arising from the accusing parent’s part, as such events are usually triggered by divorce.

He said that parental alienation is being used as a gatekeeping device by judges to create what he called a repugnant market around child abuse and domestic violence, and as a writer who tracks the way courts treat domestic violence globally, Wyeth Grant expressed his disapproval. Wyeth Grant, a writer who closely observes how courts handle domestic violence on a global scale, expressed his strong disapproval of the use of parental alienation as a gatekeeping tool by judges to foster a disturbing market centered around child abuse and domestic violence.

In a recent article titled “The Best Interests of the Abuser,” Wyeth discussed the market and highlighted the group of court appointees who benefit from the parental alienation theory.

These court-appointed individuals, including lawyers specializing in custody and divorce, therapists focusing on reunification, and social workers and counselors, are appointed to protect the interests of someone who is unable to take care of themselves.

‘They Don’t Want Evidence’

In contrast to typical court proceedings, where parties have the freedom to select their own witnesses, lawyer Richard Ducote highlighted that the judge personally chooses the individuals assigned to this court-appointed task.

Ducote, who also speaks on the growing trend of family court judges awarding custody to abusive parents, told The Epoch Times that he has represented several mothers who were stripped of custody after being accused of parental alienation but claims it’s not just for raising child abuse allegations.

“They are not interested in the proof, as it does not cater to their clientele,” he stated.

Tolu Evita, an attorney from Missouri, informed The Epoch Times that in some cases, judges at the lowest level of the family court hierarchy are involved in horrific situations where they use their positions to favor alienation of parental rights for financial and social, as well as political gain, and as a way to reward their “colleagues.”

“All judges are ultimately… Just attorneys who obtained political nominations,” she stated.

Tolu is currently representing Cynthia Haynes in the wrongful death lawsuit of her 14-year-old daughter Mikaela, who committed suicide after being forced by the court to spend time with her father Charles Haynes, despite Mikaela’s past confessions and convictions for rape.

Mikaela’s paternal grandmother, Bernice Haynes, was shocked to learn that her request for custody was denied. However, Judge John Schok also informed Mikaela that her father had repeatedly molested her.

Apart from an accusation of “parental alienation” leveled against her for bringing up Charles Haynes’s previous mistreatment, there is no evidence in the extensive case records explaining the reasons behind Cynthia Haynes losing custody of Mikaela.

Epoch Times Photo
Fourteen-year-old Mikaela Haynes killed herself after a family court judge ruled she had to live with her father, who had already admitted to molesting her oldest sister.

In October 2022, the U.N. Human Rights Council published its findings and recommendations after forming a dedicated group to investigate worldwide instances of corruption within family courts. This team dedicated a year to gathering and analyzing various cases.

The report states that the child completely ignores the possible risks, as it systematically uses similar concepts and concludes that the term “parental alienation” is being used to grant custody to fathers accused of domestic violence and strip mothers of custody.

The report stated, “When determining child custody, it is important to consider the control and power of continuation as well as the actors and agencies involved. Accusations of parental alienation by abusive fathers against mothers must be taken into account.”

Solutions Include Retraining Judges

Some efforts have been made to fix the problem of legislation pending, where children are in danger and rulings from family court judges are stopping it.

Goldstein drafted a bill called the Safe Child Act, which he is endeavoring to have enacted in every state.

Under family court judges, it would be prohibited for an abusive parent to arbitrarily order therapy for their children, and excluding evidence would be barred from the mental health proceedings.

Some states, such as North Carolina, have adopted versions of the Child Safe Act or laws named after the father, Kayden, and the little girl, Kyra. The judge in the family court ignored the warnings that the child wouldn’t be safe with him, and as a result, the girl was killed by her father.

Maybe you are interested  Watch the iconic performance that showed the world that Prince was the true king
Epoch Times Photo
Two-year-old Kyra Franchetti was murdered by her father, who authorities say shot her twice in the back during an unsupervised, court-ordered visit on July 27, 2016. (Courtesy of the Kyra Franchetti Foundation)

Kyra Franchetti, a 2-year-old girl, was killed by her father in July 2016, as authorities stated during two unsupervised visits to the court-ordered setting.

In certain states, legislators have proposed bills intended to prevent judges from straying from child maltreatment statutes.

Purposefully avoiding constitutional rights, the court expressed particular worry that two regulations in New Hampshire–in a jurisdiction where there are multiple ongoing reform bills led by Republicans targeting the state’s family courts–are.

The family division may waive the application of any rule, except where prohibited by law, if it appears to the justice to require good cause, as stated in Rule 1.2 of the New Hampshire Family Court Division. The Family Court Division in New Hampshire may choose to waive the enforcement of any rule, with the exception of situations where it is prohibited by law, if it is deemed necessary by the justice for valid reasons, as specified in Rule 1.2 of the New Hampshire Family Court Division.

The second rule, referred to as Rule 2.2, specifies that the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence are not applicable to the proceedings carried out in the family courts.

However, the court in New Hampshire may utilize its discretion to enhance the evidence presentation in a reliable, fair, orderly, and predictable manner, as stated by the Rules of Evidence.

Gender Bias Against Women

The judiciary itself embraced both regulations. State Representative J.D. Bernardy, who is also a lawyer, criticized the regulations as problematic, stating that they impede upon essential constitutional rights to procedural fairness and a just trial.

“According to him, the timeliness and availability of witnesses can be completely disrupted, and the process of access and discovery is crucial, especially when it comes to one’s children on a court docket. However, he emphasized that anything in the process should be clear, fair, and transparent.”

Ducote and other proponents, including Goldstein and Wyeth, stress the importance of changing attitudes within the system, beginning with a prejudice against women. Beginning with a prejudice against women, Ducote and other proponents, including Goldstein and Wyeth, all highlight the need to change attitudes throughout the system.

“Anyone who refers to this matter as ‘men bashing’ is engaging in denial,” Ducote stated.

Weisman’s lack of knowledge, the New Hampshire family court judge proceeded with granting the father full custody, without Weisman’s permission. The order was kept secret, and Weisman’s knowledge about the issue was testified by a veteran police officer, as reported by The Epoch Times. The officer testified about the child abuse experienced by Weisman’s daughter at the hands of her father.

Goldstein mentioned that the issue is “simply widespread.”

In high-conflict custody cases involving child abuse, the judges “are getting it wrong just about 100 percent of the time,” he said.

Court System Turns It Into a Gender Issue

These advocates all agree that in most custody disputes, fathers never think that their children would be harmed by the mothers who are the abusers.

Tolu stated that attributing child abuse to a specific gender is mainly accountable for the family court system. While advocating for its victims, she mentioned being accused of merely promoting inaccurate accounts of hatred towards women.

She exclaimed, “It’s quite amusing how this kind of criticism doesn’t emerge from the woodwork when there is a story about a scout leader or a priest molesting little boys.”

Several national institutions have also advocated for the eradication of complete immunity for judges.

Keith Neely, an attorney for the Institute for Justice, informed The Epoch Times, “Regrettably, past events demonstrate that we cannot depend on the mechanisms in place to ensure judges are held responsible.”

Earlier this year, the legal organization initiated a nationwide initiative against judicial exemption. Due to the protection they receive, judges receive minimal consequences when they commit acts as severe as condemning a child to their demise, as stated by Neely.

Law professor Stephen Gillers, who is nationally known for discussing the elimination of absolute immunity for judges, said that the practice of judges judging judges undermines the system’s ability to prevent misconduct on the bench. According to law professor Stephen Gillers, a renowned expert in the field, the nationwide discussion regarding the elimination of complete immunity for judges focuses on the fact that the practice of judges presiding over other judges weakens the system’s efficacy in preventing misconduct.

Maybe you are interested  Why You Keep Seeing 444 And 1111 (Love, Twin Flames & More)

Tolu becomes the initial person to obtain a federal judge’s consent in a custody disagreement, enabling them to initiate a civil legal action against a guardian ad litem. Moreover, certain parents are lodging legal claims against specific court appointees.

Six mothers filed a class action lawsuit against a Colorado evaluator on March 2, alleging that he deliberately concealed evidence of abuse and recommended granting custody to abusive fathers.

When Biases Turn Deadly

The reported killing of his five children and their mother by a father in Utah exemplifies such mindsets.

Following his wife’s decision to file for divorce, the tragic shooting incident occurred. At first sight, Michael Haight appeared to be a grief-stricken father who unexpectedly took the lives of his entire family, before taking his own life.

Haight’s acquaintances depicted him as a caring family man who mentored youth sports in the Little League.

However, a closer review of the killings reveals that Haight had a long history of violent assaults on his wife and children, and police records reported allegations of abuse dating as far back as 2017. It also shows his tendencies of controlling behavior.

Macie, the eldest daughter of the Haights, was recounting to her choking father the show records while banging hard objects into the wooden back of the couch and shaking it.

To review her text messages, he would take her cellphone away from her and talked about his verbal assaults on her mother.

When questioned about the abuse, Haight outrightly denied any involvement, according to records. Although Haight was never formally charged, the case was subsequently transferred to court prosecutors.

Two weeks after filing for divorce, Tausha Haight, allegedly killed her children, Gavin, a 4-year-old, and Ammon and Sienna, the 7-year-old twins, along with Briley, who was 12 years old, and Macie, who was 17 years old.

2 Horrific Cases

A crowdfunding campaign initiated in Tausha’s honor surpassed $100,000 in January.

Angelique, a 12-year-old child who had been given custody by a family court judge in Tennessee despite a history of severe child abuse cases, was shot by her father Leonard Ahearn just before the Haight family murders occurred.

Between those two horrific murder cases, Texas Collins, a fort in Zipperer, was involved, along with Adam, Jane, Audrey, Lynn, a 6-year-old, and an 8-year-old.

After the trial for the murder of 8-year-old Tommy, in which Michael Valva, the father, was given full custody and the mother’s warnings were ignored by the court judge in New York Family Court, verdicts were reached for all three cases in the same month.

Input: Mancuso Jeffrey, her father, death to beaten was who girl little a after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s ofAfter just a few months, the little girl, Kayden, experienced the tragic murder of her father, Jeffrey Mancuso, who was beaten to death. This brutal crime occurred following the federal passage of Kayden’s Law, which aims to prevent such incidents from happening again.

Despite documented proof of his threat to his daughter, a family court judge granted Mancuso joint custody.

Kids are not the sole individuals at risk.

Despite the father having shared custody, Esmeralda Casillas, 36, informed the family court that her husband, who repeatedly used guns to threaten her and her boys, was granted custody by the judge, as per her family’s account.

In November, in Los Angeles, Salvador Velasquez fatally shot Casillas in the presence of her twin sons.

The police regrets the errors made in the previous version of the article, which misstated the amount of time Berry spent helping them during the Times Epoch. The background of Goldstein’s article was described incorrectly.

Related Posts

Tropical Storm Ian is over, but some Palm Coast residents still worry about flooding

On Friday afternoon, Ralph and Ivette Esposito were wearily watching as the water crept closer to their house on Black Alder Drive in the Woodlands, Palm Coast….

Jussie Smollett Net Worth 2023: Wiki Cars House Wife Family

**TRENDING** The wealth and luxurious lifestyle of Ukraine’s President. Jussie Smollett was found guilty of five felony charges of disorderly conduct for fabricating police reports following his…

Anderson Paak Net Worth 2023: Rapper Income Career Home Age

Jay-Z’s net worth is quite impressive. If you’re interested in more recent music, you might enjoy Silk Sonic, a dynamic duo consisting of Anderson Paak and Bruno…

20 Best Memorial Day Activities

Take a tour of a National Park. Discover the unique offerings of America as you explore over 400 national park sites that exist in the U.S. Plan…

GuineaDad Food Blog: Can guinea pigs eat cantaloupe?

It’s important to learn about all the benefits and drawbacks of consuming cantaloupe, as well as carefully balance the amount of sugar they contain. While it’s true…

Fact Check: Did Micah Parsons sexually harass a teammate in Penn State’s locker room? Examining viral accusations against Cowboys star

Other players from the current Carolina Panthers defensive end, Gross-Matos Yetur Parsons and former Penn State player Isaiah Humphries, accused multiple players from Penn State of engaging…

EXCLUSIVE: Family Court Judges Sending Children Into Danger, Independent Investigations Show

The U.S. Court system has shed light on a disturbing pattern in the past three months, where at least a dozen children have been deliberately put in the custody of parents who appear to be dangerous, resulting in their tragic deaths.

According to the Center for Judicial Excellence, a national organization that closely monitors the pattern, over 900 children have lost their lives at the hands of one of their parents in the United States since 2008.

A study of the murders shows that many children were killed by a parent who was granted either shared or sole custody by a judge, despite there being strong evidence of child abuse or a conviction against them.

Out of the 53 children who have been killed since 2022 following a custody change to the fathers, it is evident that fathers are predominantly responsible for the majority of these murders, with seven being committed by mothers.

Epoch Times Photo
Three-year-old Sophia Berry was allegedly killed by her father, Dan Hollins, in January after a Colorado family court judge refused to consider evidence of child abuse. (Courtesy of Sophia Berry’s Family)

In Colorado, four children lost their lives in January and February due to murder-suicides committed by their fathers.

Court records reveal that in all four cases, judges ignored the safety concerns expressed by the mothers of the children, as reported by the Denver Gazette and confirmed by The Epoch Times, if custody was granted to the fathers, without providing any explanation.

Andrea Berry is one of those mothers. Allegedly, her ex-husband, Dan Hollins, killed their 3-year-old daughter, Sophia, and then committed suicide in February.

The Colorado Gazette reported that Elizabeth Berry, a police commander, informed her department to cease pestering Sophia, as she had been using child pornography and sexually abusing her. Berry stated that she had spent seven months attempting to get the police to investigate the allegations against him.

Judge Rebecca Moss, who insinuated that Berry would forfeit custody if she mentioned any abuse claims, received a more unfavorable reply from Douglas County Family Court when she raised such allegations.

According to court documents, Berry reported that Sophia came home with ligature marks around her ankles after encounters with him in which she told stories about sexual experiences with Hollins.

Family Judges Not Following Law

The Campaign Abuse Stop director of national research, Barry Goldstein, who is a former attorney, told The Epoch Times that one major cause of the disturbing trend of child abuse is the assumption by family court judges that the role of a therapist is more like that of a charged individual with the application of law, rather than a problem-solving role for family issues.

Goldstein stated, “The goal is to convict the person and bring criminal charges against the offender if they are a stranger.”

“The objective is to bring the offender and the victim back together, and the inquiry is conducted by a social worker in cases where the offender is an individual the child is acquainted with, particularly a close family member.”

“That implies the mother is instructing the child,” stated Goldstein, manipulating the truth in the most extreme way, “and the child is hiding all the evidence of silence and abuse,” Goldstein continued to manipulate the truth in the most extreme way, “and the mother’s coaching of the child means there is no evidence of abuse to be found, so the only option is for the child to remain silent and conceal any evidence of abuse,” Goldstein concluded.

Two studies pointed out the trend of adverse childhood experiences on abusive parents to children, which was investigated by Daniel Saunders, a professor at the National Institute of Justice and the Division of Violence Prevention at the CDC’s Justice and Prevention Violence Institute.

He studies both said that custody decisions in cases involving protective mothers and abusive fathers often favor the safety and well-being of the children, as the overwhelming evidence provided by the family court judges does not prioritize endangering them.

He stated that judges adhere to a non-scientific concept referred to as “parental

Parental Alienation

As a result of the emotional coercion by the other party, parental alienation signifies a child’s distancing from one parent, sparking a significant controversy surrounding the terminology.

Various contemporary organizations, like Project Media Justice, advocate for the concept; using well-established methods to conceal their abusive actions, as claimed by certain individuals.

Maybe you are interested  Nude pics of J.Law, Kate Upton hacked

Both sides should agree that allegations of abuse should never be dismissed merely as manipulation arising from the accusing parent’s part, as such events are usually triggered by divorce.

He said that parental alienation is being used as a gatekeeping device by judges to create what he called a repugnant market around child abuse and domestic violence, and as a writer who tracks the way courts treat domestic violence globally, Wyeth Grant expressed his disapproval. Wyeth Grant, a writer who closely observes how courts handle domestic violence on a global scale, expressed his strong disapproval of the use of parental alienation as a gatekeeping tool by judges to foster a disturbing market centered around child abuse and domestic violence.

In a recent article titled “The Best Interests of the Abuser,” Wyeth discussed the market and highlighted the group of court appointees who benefit from the parental alienation theory.

These court-appointed individuals, including lawyers specializing in custody and divorce, therapists focusing on reunification, and social workers and counselors, are appointed to protect the interests of someone who is unable to take care of themselves.

‘They Don’t Want Evidence’

In contrast to typical court proceedings, where parties have the freedom to select their own witnesses, lawyer Richard Ducote highlighted that the judge personally chooses the individuals assigned to this court-appointed task.

Ducote, who also speaks on the growing trend of family court judges awarding custody to abusive parents, told The Epoch Times that he has represented several mothers who were stripped of custody after being accused of parental alienation but claims it’s not just for raising child abuse allegations.

“They are not interested in the proof, as it does not cater to their clientele,” he stated.

Tolu Evita, an attorney from Missouri, informed The Epoch Times that in some cases, judges at the lowest level of the family court hierarchy are involved in horrific situations where they use their positions to favor alienation of parental rights for financial and social, as well as political gain, and as a way to reward their “colleagues.”

“All judges are ultimately… Just attorneys who obtained political nominations,” she stated.

Tolu is currently representing Cynthia Haynes in the wrongful death lawsuit of her 14-year-old daughter Mikaela, who committed suicide after being forced by the court to spend time with her father Charles Haynes, despite Mikaela’s past confessions and convictions for rape.

Mikaela’s paternal grandmother, Bernice Haynes, was shocked to learn that her request for custody was denied. However, Judge John Schok also informed Mikaela that her father had repeatedly molested her.

Apart from an accusation of “parental alienation” leveled against her for bringing up Charles Haynes’s previous mistreatment, there is no evidence in the extensive case records explaining the reasons behind Cynthia Haynes losing custody of Mikaela.

Epoch Times Photo
Fourteen-year-old Mikaela Haynes killed herself after a family court judge ruled she had to live with her father, who had already admitted to molesting her oldest sister.

In October 2022, the U.N. Human Rights Council published its findings and recommendations after forming a dedicated group to investigate worldwide instances of corruption within family courts. This team dedicated a year to gathering and analyzing various cases.

The report states that the child completely ignores the possible risks, as it systematically uses similar concepts and concludes that the term “parental alienation” is being used to grant custody to fathers accused of domestic violence and strip mothers of custody.

The report stated, “When determining child custody, it is important to consider the control and power of continuation as well as the actors and agencies involved. Accusations of parental alienation by abusive fathers against mothers must be taken into account.”

Solutions Include Retraining Judges

Some efforts have been made to fix the problem of legislation pending, where children are in danger and rulings from family court judges are stopping it.

Goldstein drafted a bill called the Safe Child Act, which he is endeavoring to have enacted in every state.

Under family court judges, it would be prohibited for an abusive parent to arbitrarily order therapy for their children, and excluding evidence would be barred from the mental health proceedings.

Some states, such as North Carolina, have adopted versions of the Child Safe Act or laws named after the father, Kayden, and the little girl, Kyra. The judge in the family court ignored the warnings that the child wouldn’t be safe with him, and as a result, the girl was killed by her father.

Maybe you are interested  (New) Foo fighters presale code 2024 – Artist, Ticketmaster, Amex, Livenation & more
Epoch Times Photo
Two-year-old Kyra Franchetti was murdered by her father, who authorities say shot her twice in the back during an unsupervised, court-ordered visit on July 27, 2016. (Courtesy of the Kyra Franchetti Foundation)

Kyra Franchetti, a 2-year-old girl, was killed by her father in July 2016, as authorities stated during two unsupervised visits to the court-ordered setting.

In certain states, legislators have proposed bills intended to prevent judges from straying from child maltreatment statutes.

Purposefully avoiding constitutional rights, the court expressed particular worry that two regulations in New Hampshire–in a jurisdiction where there are multiple ongoing reform bills led by Republicans targeting the state’s family courts–are.

The family division may waive the application of any rule, except where prohibited by law, if it appears to the justice to require good cause, as stated in Rule 1.2 of the New Hampshire Family Court Division. The Family Court Division in New Hampshire may choose to waive the enforcement of any rule, with the exception of situations where it is prohibited by law, if it is deemed necessary by the justice for valid reasons, as specified in Rule 1.2 of the New Hampshire Family Court Division.

The second rule, referred to as Rule 2.2, specifies that the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence are not applicable to the proceedings carried out in the family courts.

However, the court in New Hampshire may utilize its discretion to enhance the evidence presentation in a reliable, fair, orderly, and predictable manner, as stated by the Rules of Evidence.

Gender Bias Against Women

The judiciary itself embraced both regulations. State Representative J.D. Bernardy, who is also a lawyer, criticized the regulations as problematic, stating that they impede upon essential constitutional rights to procedural fairness and a just trial.

“According to him, the timeliness and availability of witnesses can be completely disrupted, and the process of access and discovery is crucial, especially when it comes to one’s children on a court docket. However, he emphasized that anything in the process should be clear, fair, and transparent.”

Ducote and other proponents, including Goldstein and Wyeth, stress the importance of changing attitudes within the system, beginning with a prejudice against women. Beginning with a prejudice against women, Ducote and other proponents, including Goldstein and Wyeth, all highlight the need to change attitudes throughout the system.

“Anyone who refers to this matter as ‘men bashing’ is engaging in denial,” Ducote stated.

Weisman’s lack of knowledge, the New Hampshire family court judge proceeded with granting the father full custody, without Weisman’s permission. The order was kept secret, and Weisman’s knowledge about the issue was testified by a veteran police officer, as reported by The Epoch Times. The officer testified about the child abuse experienced by Weisman’s daughter at the hands of her father.

Goldstein mentioned that the issue is “simply widespread.”

In high-conflict custody cases involving child abuse, the judges “are getting it wrong just about 100 percent of the time,” he said.

Court System Turns It Into a Gender Issue

These advocates all agree that in most custody disputes, fathers never think that their children would be harmed by the mothers who are the abusers.

Tolu stated that attributing child abuse to a specific gender is mainly accountable for the family court system. While advocating for its victims, she mentioned being accused of merely promoting inaccurate accounts of hatred towards women.

She exclaimed, “It’s quite amusing how this kind of criticism doesn’t emerge from the woodwork when there is a story about a scout leader or a priest molesting little boys.”

Several national institutions have also advocated for the eradication of complete immunity for judges.

Keith Neely, an attorney for the Institute for Justice, informed The Epoch Times, “Regrettably, past events demonstrate that we cannot depend on the mechanisms in place to ensure judges are held responsible.”

Earlier this year, the legal organization initiated a nationwide initiative against judicial exemption. Due to the protection they receive, judges receive minimal consequences when they commit acts as severe as condemning a child to their demise, as stated by Neely.

Law professor Stephen Gillers, who is nationally known for discussing the elimination of absolute immunity for judges, said that the practice of judges judging judges undermines the system’s ability to prevent misconduct on the bench. According to law professor Stephen Gillers, a renowned expert in the field, the nationwide discussion regarding the elimination of complete immunity for judges focuses on the fact that the practice of judges presiding over other judges weakens the system’s efficacy in preventing misconduct.

Maybe you are interested  Watch the iconic performance that showed the world that Prince was the true king

Tolu becomes the initial person to obtain a federal judge’s consent in a custody disagreement, enabling them to initiate a civil legal action against a guardian ad litem. Moreover, certain parents are lodging legal claims against specific court appointees.

Six mothers filed a class action lawsuit against a Colorado evaluator on March 2, alleging that he deliberately concealed evidence of abuse and recommended granting custody to abusive fathers.

When Biases Turn Deadly

The reported killing of his five children and their mother by a father in Utah exemplifies such mindsets.

Following his wife’s decision to file for divorce, the tragic shooting incident occurred. At first sight, Michael Haight appeared to be a grief-stricken father who unexpectedly took the lives of his entire family, before taking his own life.

Haight’s acquaintances depicted him as a caring family man who mentored youth sports in the Little League.

However, a closer review of the killings reveals that Haight had a long history of violent assaults on his wife and children, and police records reported allegations of abuse dating as far back as 2017. It also shows his tendencies of controlling behavior.

Macie, the eldest daughter of the Haights, was recounting to her choking father the show records while banging hard objects into the wooden back of the couch and shaking it.

To review her text messages, he would take her cellphone away from her and talked about his verbal assaults on her mother.

When questioned about the abuse, Haight outrightly denied any involvement, according to records. Although Haight was never formally charged, the case was subsequently transferred to court prosecutors.

Two weeks after filing for divorce, Tausha Haight, allegedly killed her children, Gavin, a 4-year-old, and Ammon and Sienna, the 7-year-old twins, along with Briley, who was 12 years old, and Macie, who was 17 years old.

2 Horrific Cases

A crowdfunding campaign initiated in Tausha’s honor surpassed $100,000 in January.

Angelique, a 12-year-old child who had been given custody by a family court judge in Tennessee despite a history of severe child abuse cases, was shot by her father Leonard Ahearn just before the Haight family murders occurred.

Between those two horrific murder cases, Texas Collins, a fort in Zipperer, was involved, along with Adam, Jane, Audrey, Lynn, a 6-year-old, and an 8-year-old.

After the trial for the murder of 8-year-old Tommy, in which Michael Valva, the father, was given full custody and the mother’s warnings were ignored by the court judge in New York Family Court, verdicts were reached for all three cases in the same month.

Input: Mancuso Jeffrey, her father, death to beaten was who girl little a after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s of passage federal the after months few a only happened murder the Law, Kayden’s ofAfter just a few months, the little girl, Kayden, experienced the tragic murder of her father, Jeffrey Mancuso, who was beaten to death. This brutal crime occurred following the federal passage of Kayden’s Law, which aims to prevent such incidents from happening again.

Despite documented proof of his threat to his daughter, a family court judge granted Mancuso joint custody.

Kids are not the sole individuals at risk.

Despite the father having shared custody, Esmeralda Casillas, 36, informed the family court that her husband, who repeatedly used guns to threaten her and her boys, was granted custody by the judge, as per her family’s account.

In November, in Los Angeles, Salvador Velasquez fatally shot Casillas in the presence of her twin sons.

The police regrets the errors made in the previous version of the article, which misstated the amount of time Berry spent helping them during the Times Epoch. The background of Goldstein’s article was described incorrectly.

Related Posts

Tropical Storm Ian is over, but some Palm Coast residents still worry about flooding

On Friday afternoon, Ralph and Ivette Esposito were wearily watching as the water crept closer to their house on Black Alder Drive in the Woodlands, Palm Coast….

Jussie Smollett Net Worth 2023: Wiki Cars House Wife Family

**TRENDING** The wealth and luxurious lifestyle of Ukraine’s President. Jussie Smollett was found guilty of five felony charges of disorderly conduct for fabricating police reports following his…

Anderson Paak Net Worth 2023: Rapper Income Career Home Age

Jay-Z’s net worth is quite impressive. If you’re interested in more recent music, you might enjoy Silk Sonic, a dynamic duo consisting of Anderson Paak and Bruno…

20 Best Memorial Day Activities

Take a tour of a National Park. Discover the unique offerings of America as you explore over 400 national park sites that exist in the U.S. Plan…

GuineaDad Food Blog: Can guinea pigs eat cantaloupe?

It’s important to learn about all the benefits and drawbacks of consuming cantaloupe, as well as carefully balance the amount of sugar they contain. While it’s true…

Fact Check: Did Micah Parsons sexually harass a teammate in Penn State’s locker room? Examining viral accusations against Cowboys star

Other players from the current Carolina Panthers defensive end, Gross-Matos Yetur Parsons and former Penn State player Isaiah Humphries, accused multiple players from Penn State of engaging…